Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKFX vs RLBAX
FBKFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBKFX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K6
Price$17.17
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
FBKFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKFX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. FBKFX (2.15B). FBKFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBKFX (1.79) vs RLBAX (1.10). FBKFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBKFX (6 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FBKFX (0.32). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBKFX (25.00). FBKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBKFX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FBKFX (8.09) and RLBAX (7.84) have marching annual gain over last year. FBKFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.99 vs. RLBAX (37.69).
| FBKFX | RLBAX | FBKFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.939 | 13.947 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 265B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.10 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.09 | 7.84 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.34 | 47.39 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.99 | 37.69 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement