Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKFX vs RLBAX
FBKFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBKFX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K6
Price$17.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.31
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
FBKFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKFX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FBKFX (2.18B). FBKFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBKFX (1.81) vs RLBAX (1.07). FBKFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBKFX (7 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FBKFX (0.32). FBKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FBKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBKFX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FBKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. RLBAX (8.49). FBKFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.25 vs. RLBAX (30.80).
| FBKFX | RLBAX | FBKFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.102 | 10.082 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.07 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.19 | 8.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.45 | 35.20 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.25 | 30.80 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers