FBIN
Price
$48.81
Change
-$0.57 (-1.15%)
Updated
Nov 13, 03:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.93B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LII
Price
$480.78
Change
+$3.83 (+0.80%)
Updated
Nov 13, 03:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.73B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBIN vs LII

Header iconFBIN vs LII Comparison
Open Charts FBIN vs LIIBanner chart's image
Fortune Brands Innovations
Price$48.81
Change-$0.57 (-1.15%)
Volume$695
Capitalization5.93B
Lennox International
Price$480.78
Change+$3.83 (+0.80%)
Volume$290
Capitalization16.73B
FBIN vs LII Comparison Chart in %
FBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBIN vs. LII commentary
Nov 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBIN is a Buy and LII is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FBIN: $49.38 vs. LII: $476.95)
Brand notoriety: FBIN and LII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBIN: 145% vs. LII: 115%
Market capitalization -- FBIN: $5.93B vs. LII: $16.73B
FBIN [@Building Products] is valued at $5.93B. LII’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $16.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $93.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBIN is a better buy in the long-term than LII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LII’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LII’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBIN is a better buy in the short-term than LII.

Price Growth

FBIN (@Building Products) experienced а -2.57% price change this week, while LII (@Building Products) price change was -2.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

LII is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.82% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LII($16.7B) has a higher market cap than FBIN($5.93B). LII has higher P/E ratio than FBIN: LII (20.15) vs FBIN (18.49). LII YTD gains are higher at: -21.176 vs. FBIN (-26.780). LII has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.16B vs. FBIN (839M). LII has less debt than FBIN: LII (1.55B) vs FBIN (3B). LII has higher revenues than FBIN: LII (5.42B) vs FBIN (4.5B).
FBINLIIFBIN / LII
Capitalization5.93B16.7B36%
EBITDA839M1.16B72%
Gain YTD-26.780-21.176126%
P/E Ratio18.4920.1592%
Revenue4.5B5.42B83%
Total Cash235MN/A-
Total Debt3B1.55B194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBIN vs LII: Fundamental Ratings
FBIN
LII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10044
SMR RATING
1..100
5013
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6481
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBIN's Valuation (48) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LII (78). This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

LII's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBIN (100). This means that LII’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

LII's SMR Rating (13) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBIN (50). This means that LII’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LII (81). This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as LII (81). This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to LII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBINLII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LII
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRTNX80.760.44
+0.55%
Bretton Fund
PMFPX24.430.09
+0.37%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index R5
BLNAX14.010.03
+0.21%
Meeder Balanced Adviser
ASVGX9.89N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value R5
OLGCX58.39-0.16
-0.27%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth C

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
+1.25%
MAS - FBIN
86%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
BLDR - FBIN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
OC - FBIN
75%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
TREX - FBIN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
BXC - FBIN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
More

LII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LII has been closely correlated with CARR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LII jumps, then CARR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LII
1D Price
Change %
LII100%
-2.14%
CARR - LII
67%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
MAS - LII
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
IR - LII
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
FBIN - LII
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
OC - LII
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More