FBIN
Price
$57.15
Change
-$0.35 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.86B
48 days until earnings call
GMS
Price
$109.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.2B
91 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBIN vs GMS

Header iconFBIN vs GMS Comparison
Open Charts FBIN vs GMSBanner chart's image
Fortune Brands Innovations
Price$57.15
Change-$0.35 (-0.61%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization6.86B
GMS
Price$109.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
Volume$713.43K
Capitalization4.2B
FBIN vs GMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBIN vs. GMS commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBIN is a Buy and GMS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FBIN: $57.15 vs. GMS: $109.96)
Brand notoriety: FBIN and GMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBIN: 58% vs. GMS: 46%
Market capitalization -- FBIN: $6.86B vs. GMS: $4.2B
FBIN [@Building Products] is valued at $6.86B. GMS’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $4.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $90.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMS is a better buy in the long-term than FBIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMS is a better buy in the short-term than FBIN.

Price Growth

FBIN (@Building Products) experienced а -3.97% price change this week, while GMS (@Building Products) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

GMS is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.30% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBIN($6.86B) has a higher market cap than GMS($4.2B). GMS has higher P/E ratio than FBIN: GMS (41.81) vs FBIN (18.03). GMS YTD gains are higher at: 29.624 vs. FBIN (-15.259). GMS has less debt than FBIN: GMS (1.6B) vs FBIN (3B).
FBINGMSFBIN / GMS
Capitalization6.86B4.2B163%
EBITDAN/A428M-
Gain YTD-15.25929.624-52%
P/E Ratio18.0341.8143%
RevenueN/A5.51B-
Total CashN/A55.6M-
Total Debt3B1.6B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBIN vs GMS: Fundamental Ratings
FBIN
GMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10017
SMR RATING
1..100
5177
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
745
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBIN's Valuation (64) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GMS (72) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBIN (100) in the Building Products industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

FBIN's SMR Rating (51) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GMS (77) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FBIN’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FBIN (58) in the Building Products industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

GMS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBIN (74) in the Building Products industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than FBIN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBINGMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VPMAX185.790.63
+0.34%
Vanguard PRIMECAP Adm
FZACX40.03N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Z
FHESX14.36N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq IS
CVFCX16.33-0.02
-0.12%
Victory Pioneer Disciplined Value A
LVOYX20.00-0.04
-0.20%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities I

FBIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBIN has been closely correlated with MAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBIN jumps, then MAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBIN
1D Price
Change %
FBIN100%
-0.61%
MAS - FBIN
87%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
OC - FBIN
78%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
BLDR - FBIN
77%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
TREX - FBIN
74%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
NX - FBIN
67%
Closely correlated
-3.32%
More

GMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMS
1D Price
Change %
GMS100%
-0.01%
BLDR - GMS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
OC - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
FBIN - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
WMS - GMS
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
AWI - GMS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More