Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs FCGTX
FBGTX vs FCGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. FCGTX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and FCGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (50.4B) and FCGTX (50.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX (1.34) and FBGTX (1.28) have matching dividends . FBGTX was incepted earlier than FCGTX: FBGTX (12 years) vs FCGTX (9 years). FBGTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FBGTX (6.00) and FCGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FBGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (13.96) and FBGTX (13.88) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (36.91) and FBGTX (36.44) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | FCGTX | FBGTX / FCGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.36 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.794 | 19.941 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4B | 50.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 1.34 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.88 | 13.96 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.41 | 45.67 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.44 | 36.91 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers