Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs RGACX
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs RGACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$254.65
Change+$2.23 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FBGRX (80.5B). FBGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FBGRX (0.20) vs RGACX (0.07). FBGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBGRX (38 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00). FBGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBGRX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.87 vs. RGACX (21.05). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 71.32 vs. RGACX (42.51).
| FBGRX | RGACX | FBGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.94 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.94 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.115 | 16.155 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 332B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.07 | 283% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.87 | 21.05 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.95 | 51.55 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.32 | 42.51 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 275.04 | 97.10 | 283% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement