Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGRX vs RGACX
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGRX vs RGACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth
Price$252.73
Change-$0.58 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.77B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FBGRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGRX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FBGRX (79.8B). FBGRX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FBGRX (0.20) vs RGACX (0.07). FBGRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBGRX (38 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FBGRX (0.47). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGRX (22.00). FBGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBGRX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.75 vs. RGACX (14.08). FBGRX return over 5 years is better than : 77.98 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| FBGRX | RGACX | FBGRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.94 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.94 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.251 | 14.044 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.8B | 329B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.07 | 281% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.75 | 14.08 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.88 | 41.19 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.98 | 41.95 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.93 | 83.68 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement