Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs RGACX
FBGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$254.27
Change-$0.59 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.77B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FBGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FBGKX (79.8B). FBGKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FBGKX (0.28) vs RGACX (0.07). FBGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBGKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FBGKX (0.40). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBGKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.88 vs. RGACX (14.08). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 78.72 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| FBGKX | RGACX | FBGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.94 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.94 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.297 | 14.044 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.8B | 329B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.07 | 385% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.88 | 14.08 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.40 | 41.19 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.72 | 41.95 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.80 | 83.68 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement