Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGKX vs RGACX
FBGKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBGKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K
Price$257.03
Change+$0.79 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
FBGKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGKX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGKX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FBGKX (80.5B). FBGKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FBGKX (0.28) vs RGACX (0.07). FBGKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBGKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FBGKX (0.40). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBGKX (22.00). FBGKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBGKX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. RGACX (12.22). FBGKX return over 5 years is better than : 83.63 vs. RGACX (45.63).
| FBGKX | RGACX | FBGKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.94 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.94 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.505 | 17.183 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.5B | 337B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.07 | 388% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | 12.22 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.74 | 71.26 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.63 | 45.63 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 309.48 | 111.15 | 278% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement