FBGI
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
340.81M
RTBRF
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.20 (-11.83%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
210.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBGI vs RTBRF

Header iconFBGI vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FBGI vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
Foodbase Group
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$77.64K
Capitalization340.81M
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.49
Change-$0.20 (-11.83%)
Volume$913
Capitalization210.53M
FBGI vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBGI vs. RTBRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGI is a Hold and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FBGI: $0.01 vs. RTBRF: $1.49)
Brand notoriety: FBGI and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBGI: 100% vs. RTBRF: 31%
Market capitalization -- FBGI: $340.81M vs. RTBRF: $210.53M
FBGI [@Restaurants] is valued at $340.81M. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $210.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTBRF is a better buy in the long-term than FBGI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBGI’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBGI’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBGI is a better buy in the short-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

FBGI (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGI($341M) has a higher market cap than RTBRF($211M). FBGI YTD gains are higher at: 9.091 vs. RTBRF (-5.096).
FBGIRTBRFFBGI / RTBRF
Capitalization341M211M162%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.091-5.096-178%
P/E RatioN/A12.23-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBGI vs RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
FBGI
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9564
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5383
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10060
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTBRF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (37). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (100). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (95). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

FBGI's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (83). This means that FBGI’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBGI (100). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBGIRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGNCX14.170.12
+0.85%
Macquarie Natural Resources C
MXTFX7.18N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
FAPJX13.34N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future A
PNOPX127.78-0.23
-0.18%
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
GRMAX30.18-0.09
-0.30%
Nationwide S&P 500 Index A

FBGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBGI and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBGI and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBGI
1D Price
Change %
FBGI100%
N/A
RTBRF - FBGI
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - FBGI
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - FBGI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - RTBRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FWRG - RTBRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More