FBGI
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
340.81M
RTBRF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.22 (-12.29%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
214.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBGI vs RTBRF

Header iconFBGI vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FBGI vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
Foodbase Group
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$77.64K
Capitalization340.81M
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.57
Change-$0.22 (-12.29%)
Volume$8.04K
Capitalization214.45M
FBGI vs RTBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBGI vs. RTBRF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGI is a Hold and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FBGI: $0.01 vs. RTBRF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: FBGI and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBGI: 100% vs. RTBRF: 371%
Market capitalization -- FBGI: $340.81M vs. RTBRF: $214.45M
FBGI [@Restaurants] is valued at $340.81M. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $214.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FBGI and RTBRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBGI’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTBRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBGI’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • RTBRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBGI is a better buy in the short-term than RTBRF.

Price Growth

FBGI (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.43% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGI($341M) has a higher market cap than RTBRF($214M). FBGI YTD gains are higher at: 9.091 vs. RTBRF (-0.159).
FBGIRTBRFFBGI / RTBRF
Capitalization341M214M159%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.091-0.159-5,709%
P/E RatioN/A12.44-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBGI vs RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
FBGI
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9463
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5281
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTBRF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (38). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (100). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (94). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

FBGI's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as RTBRF (81). This means that FBGI’s stock grew similarly to RTBRF’s over the last 12 months.

RTBRF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FBGI (100). This means that RTBRF’s stock grew similarly to FBGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBGIRTBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTBRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCMSX31.910.45
+1.43%
HCM Tactical Plus R
FSEWX14.210.11
+0.78%
Fidelity Sustainable U.S. Eq Z
AMONX24.090.14
+0.58%
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style N
TCGRX30.020.15
+0.50%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R4
CSDIX17.46-0.18
-1.02%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities I

FBGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBGI and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBGI and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBGI
1D Price
Change %
FBGI100%
N/A
RTBRF - FBGI
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - FBGI
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.36%
RSTRF - FBGI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBGI - RTBRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.36%
FWRG - RTBRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More