Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBFRX vs HBLCX
FBFRX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FBFRX vs HBLCX
Franklin Managed Income R6
Price$12.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.33B
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
FBFRX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBFRX vs. HBLCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBFRX is a Buy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FBFRX (3.33B). FBFRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FBFRX (4.68) vs HBLCX (2.64). FBFRX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FBFRX (12 years) vs HBLCX (19 years). HBLCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FBFRX (0.60). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FBFRX (31.92). HBLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFRX: HBLCX (2000) vs FBFRX (1000000). FBFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. HBLCX (3.34). FBFRX return over 5 years is better than : 27.43 vs. HBLCX (10.72).
| FBFRX | HBLCX | FBFRX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.64 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.64 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.739 | 6.604 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 3.33B | 11.9B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.68 | 2.64 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.99 | 3.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.17 | 8.52 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.43 | 10.72 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.75 | 32.45 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers