Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBETX vs NSFFX
FBETX vs NSFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBETX vs. NSFFX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBETX is a Hold and NSFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBETX has more cash in the bank: 51.2B vs. NSFFX (6.44M). NSFFX pays higher dividends than FBETX: NSFFX (2.27) vs FBETX (2.12). FBETX was incepted earlier than NSFFX: FBETX (11 years) vs NSFFX (8 years). NSFFX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FBETX (0.42). NSFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FBETX (7.00). FBETX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFFX: FBETX (250) vs NSFFX (1000000). FBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.53 vs. NSFFX (-8.63). FBETX return over 5 years is better than : 30.18 vs. NSFFX (3.58).
| FBETX | NSFFX | FBETX / NSFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.47 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 1.39 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.895 | -9.337 | -106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.2B | 6.44M | 795,649% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.12 | 2.27 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.53 | -8.63 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.52 | 6.98 | 437% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.18 | 3.58 | 842% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement