Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBDIX vs FSPHX
FBDIX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBDIX vs. FSPHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBDIX is a StrongBuy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. FBDIX (1.03B). FBDIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FBDIX (1.94) vs FSPHX (0.43). FBDIX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBDIX (28 years) vs FSPHX (45 years). FBDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FBDIX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBDIX: FSPHX (0) vs FBDIX (1000). FBDIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.70 vs. FSPHX (0.29). FBDIX return over 5 years is better than : -6.05 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FBDIX | FSPHX | FBDIX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.63 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.63 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.834 | 0.809 | 227% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.03B | 6.28B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.43 | 455% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.70 | 0.29 | 13,787% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.69 | 1.47 | 3,649% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.05 | -13.13 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.85 | 62.61 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement