Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBCGX vs RGACX
FBCGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FBCGX vs RGACX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6
Price$41.56
Change-$0.07 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.05B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
FBCGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBCGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBCGX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FBCGX (17.1B). FBCGX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FBCGX (0.55) vs RGACX (0.07). FBCGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FBCGX (8 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FBCGX (0.45). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBCGX (17.00). FBCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FBCGX (0) vs RGACX (250). FBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.79 vs. RGACX (17.83). FBCGX return over 5 years is better than : 101.15 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| FBCGX | RGACX | FBCGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.94 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.843 | 15.516 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 332B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.07 | 778% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.79 | 17.83 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.41 | 58.53 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.15 | 40.02 | 253% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement