FBBPF
Price
$4.33
Change
-$0.25 (-5.46%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
18.72B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FESNF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
458.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBBPF vs FESNF

Header iconFBBPF vs FESNF Comparison
Open Charts FBBPF vs FESNFBanner chart's image
FIBRA PROLOGIS REIT CTFS
Price$4.33
Change-$0.25 (-5.46%)
Volume$233
Capitalization18.72B
First Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization458.19M
FBBPF vs FESNF Comparison Chart in %
FBBPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FESNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBBPF vs. FESNF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBBPF is a Hold and FESNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FBBPF: $4.33 vs. FESNF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: FBBPF and FESNF are both not notable
FBBPF represents the Miscellaneous Manufacturing, while FESNF is part of the Publishing: Books/Magazines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBBPF: 1% vs. FESNF: 22%
Market capitalization -- FBBPF: $18.72B vs. FESNF: $458.19M
FBBPF [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] is valued at $18.72B. FESNF’s [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] market capitalization is $458.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $122.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $129.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $9.33B. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $9.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBBPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFESNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBBPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FESNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBBPF is a better buy in the long-term than FESNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBBPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FESNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBBPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FESNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FESNF is a better buy in the short-term than FBBPF.

Price Growth

FBBPF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while FESNF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+2.38% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+0.80% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBBPF($18.7B) has a higher market cap than FESNF($458M). FBBPF has higher P/E ratio than FESNF: FBBPF (23.43) vs FESNF (14.14). FBBPF YTD gains are higher at: -2.434 vs. FESNF (-3.857). FBBPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.1B vs. FESNF (71.3M). FBBPF has more cash in the bank: 2.18B vs. FESNF (35.6M). FESNF has less debt than FBBPF: FESNF (462M) vs FBBPF (40.8B). FBBPF has higher revenues than FESNF: FBBPF (12.5B) vs FESNF (101M).
FBBPFFESNFFBBPF / FESNF
Capitalization18.7B458M4,083%
EBITDA16.1B71.3M22,581%
Gain YTD-2.434-3.85763%
P/E Ratio23.4314.14166%
Revenue12.5B101M12,376%
Total Cash2.18B35.6M6,121%
Total Debt40.8B462M8,831%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBBPF vs FESNF: Fundamental Ratings
FBBPF
FESNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6199
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
6886
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBBPF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (81). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FESNF (100). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew significantly faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (86). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (59). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FBBPF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (14). This means that FBBPF’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBBPFFESNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBBPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FESNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRTY29.520.14
+0.46%
Cambria Trinity ETF
PAAA51.390.01
+0.02%
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
XCNY29.08N/A
N/A
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
LQDH93.82-0.01
-0.01%
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corp Bd ETF
JANH24.66-0.04
-0.15%
Innovator Premium Income 20 Bar ETF -Jan

FBBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBBPF and FESNF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBBPF and FESNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBBPF
1D Price
Change %
FBBPF100%
N/A
FESNF - FBBPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRIVF - FBBPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EFRTF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DREUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
FRMUF - FBBPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

FESNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FESNF
1D Price
Change %
FESNF100%
N/A
MAPIF - FESNF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNSPF - FESNF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
DOC - FESNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
CHTH - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More