FBASF
Price
$1.42
Change
+$0.03 (+2.16%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
WRDEF
Price
$16.00
Change
+$1.00 (+6.67%)
Updated
Feb 24 closing price
Capitalization
717.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBASF vs WRDEF

Header iconFBASF vs WRDEF Comparison
Open Charts FBASF vs WRDEFBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.42
Change+$0.03 (+2.16%)
Volume$37K
Capitalization5.74B
Wereldhave
Price$16.00
Change+$1.00 (+6.67%)
Volume$511
Capitalization717.51M
FBASF vs WRDEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBASF vs. WRDEF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBASF is a Hold and WRDEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FBASF: $1.42 vs. WRDEF: $16.00)
Brand notoriety: FBASF and WRDEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBASF: 220% vs. WRDEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FBASF: $5.74B vs. WRDEF: $717.51M
FBASF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $5.74B. WRDEF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $717.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWRDEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WRDEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBASF is a better buy in the long-term than WRDEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBASF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FBASF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FBASF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while WRDEF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.53% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBASF($5.74B) has a higher market cap than WRDEF($718M). FBASF YTD gains are higher at: 42.000 vs. WRDEF (6.667). FBASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. WRDEF (117M). FBASF has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. WRDEF (19.5M). WRDEF has less debt than FBASF: WRDEF (919M) vs FBASF (128B). FBASF has higher revenues than WRDEF: FBASF (24.6B) vs WRDEF (172M).
FBASFWRDEFFBASF / WRDEF
Capitalization5.74B718M800%
EBITDA39.1B117M33,419%
Gain YTD42.0006.667630%
P/E Ratio3.47N/A-
Revenue24.6B172M14,302%
Total Cash3.51B19.5M18,000%
Total Debt128B919M13,928%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBASF vs WRDEF: Fundamental Ratings
FBASF
WRDEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5328
SMR RATING
1..100
8486
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRDEF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FBASF (27). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew similarly to FBASF’s over the last 12 months.

WRDEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as FBASF (53). This means that WRDEF’s stock grew similarly to FBASF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDEF (86). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to WRDEF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as WRDEF (54). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to WRDEF’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WRDEF (71). This means that FBASF’s stock grew significantly faster than WRDEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBASFWRDEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AKRSX75.191.03
+1.39%
Akre Focus Supra Institutional
DUSQX34.440.28
+0.82%
DFA US Large Cap Equity Institutional
SSSIX25.760.20
+0.78%
SouthernSun Small Cap, I
PGJZX18.040.05
+0.28%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Z
POVDX31.870.01
+0.03%
Putnam International Equity R5

FBASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBASF and HHDS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBASF and HHDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBASF
1D Price
Change %
FBASF100%
N/A
HHDS - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
+497.93%
ATTRF - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQFT - FBASF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNL - FBASF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
WRDEF - FBASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRDEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRDEF and ACR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRDEF and ACR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRDEF
1D Price
Change %
WRDEF100%
N/A
ACR - WRDEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
MNARF - WRDEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLCP - WRDEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
UNBLF - WRDEF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRZCF - WRDEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More