FBASF
Price
$1.42
Change
+$0.03 (+2.16%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
5.74B
HHDS
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.07 (+350.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
88.82K
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBASF vs HHDS

Header iconFBASF vs HHDS Comparison
Open Charts FBASF vs HHDSBanner chart's image
Deutsche Bank Mexico SA Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$1.42
Change+$0.03 (+2.16%)
Volume$37K
Capitalization5.74B
Highlands REIT
Price$0.09
Change+$0.07 (+350.00%)
Volume$100.81K
Capitalization88.82K
FBASF vs HHDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HHDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBASF vs. HHDS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBASF is a Hold and HHDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FBASF: $1.42 vs. HHDS: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: FBASF and HHDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBASF: 220% vs. HHDS: 223%
Market capitalization -- FBASF: $5.74B vs. HHDS: $88.82K
FBASF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $5.74B. HHDS’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $88.82K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBASF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHHDS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBASF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HHDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBASF is a better buy in the long-term than HHDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBASF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HHDS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBASF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HHDS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HHDS is a better buy in the short-term than FBASF.

Price Growth

FBASF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while HHDS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.53% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBASF($5.74B) has a higher market cap than HHDS($88.8K). HHDS YTD gains are higher at: 73.077 vs. FBASF (42.000). FBASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.1B vs. HHDS (4.65M). FBASF has more cash in the bank: 3.51B vs. HHDS (34.2M). HHDS has less debt than FBASF: HHDS (71.3M) vs FBASF (128B). FBASF has higher revenues than HHDS: FBASF (24.6B) vs HHDS (30.8M).
FBASFHHDSFBASF / HHDS
Capitalization5.74B88.8K6,467,342%
EBITDA39.1B4.65M841,041%
Gain YTD42.00073.07757%
P/E Ratio3.47N/A-
Revenue24.6B30.8M79,870%
Total Cash3.51B34.2M10,263%
Total Debt128B71.3M179,523%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBASF vs HHDS: Fundamental Ratings
FBASF
HHDS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5389
SMR RATING
1..100
8491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBASF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HHDS (74). This means that FBASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HHDS’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HHDS (89). This means that FBASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HHDS’s over the last 12 months.

FBASF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as HHDS (91). This means that FBASF’s stock grew similarly to HHDS’s over the last 12 months.

HHDS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FBASF (46). This means that HHDS’s stock grew similarly to FBASF’s over the last 12 months.

HHDS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FBASF (5). This means that HHDS’s stock grew similarly to FBASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBASFHHDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HHDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FYT53.130.22
+0.41%
First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF
DNP9.770.03
+0.31%
DNP Select Income Fund
HPS14.470.01
+0.07%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund III
MUD15.80-0.03
-0.19%
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
NOM10.30-0.06
-0.60%
Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund

FBASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBASF and HHDS have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBASF and HHDS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBASF
1D Price
Change %
FBASF100%
N/A
HHDS - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
+497.93%
ATTRF - FBASF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQFT - FBASF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNL - FBASF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
WRDEF - FBASF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HHDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HHDS has been loosely correlated with MEIYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HHDS jumps, then MEIYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HHDS
1D Price
Change %
HHDS100%
+497.93%
MEIYF - HHDS
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SACH - HHDS
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
FBASF - HHDS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRWRF - HHDS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRZCF - HHDS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More