Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAKX vs RLBAX
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBAKX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K
Price$31.77
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.3B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAKX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. FBAKX (60.3B). FBAKX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBAKX (1.68) vs RLBAX (1.10). FBAKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBAKX (17 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FBAKX (0.39). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBAKX (24.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBAKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (7.84) and FBAKX (7.75) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. FBAKX (29.38).
| FBAKX | RLBAX | FBAKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.773 | 13.947 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.3B | 265B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.10 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.75 | 7.84 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.55 | 47.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.38 | 37.69 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.20 | 67.66 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement