Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAKX vs RLBAX
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBAKX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K
Price$32.10
Change-$0.39 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.25B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAKX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FBAKX (61.3B). FBAKX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBAKX (1.71) vs RLBAX (1.08). FBAKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBAKX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FBAKX (0.39). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBAKX (24.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBAKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (9.08) and FBAKX (8.94) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.92 vs. FBAKX (29.48).
| FBAKX | RLBAX | FBAKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.484 | 15.481 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 61.3B | 269B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 1.08 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 9.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.60 | 40.52 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.48 | 36.92 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.75 | 69.99 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement