Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAKX vs RLBAX
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBAKX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Balanced K
Price$31.77
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.11B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
FBAKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBAKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBAKX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FBAKX (58.1B). FBAKX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBAKX (1.75) vs RLBAX (1.17). FBAKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBAKX (17 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FBAKX (0.39). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBAKX (24.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FBAKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FBAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. RLBAX (7.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. FBAKX (28.83).
| FBAKX | RLBAX | FBAKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.31 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.508 | 9.243 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.1B | 256B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.17 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 7.15 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.34 | 27.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.83 | 33.77 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.30 | 59.12 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement