Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBAFX vs MNBRX
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison
Open Charts FBAFX vs MNBRX
American Funds American Balanced 529-F-2
Price$37.68
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term R
Price$19.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.2M
FBAFX vs MNBRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. MNBRX (436M). FBAFX pays higher dividends than MNBRX: FBAFX (1.90) vs MNBRX (1.59). FBAFX was incepted earlier than MNBRX: FBAFX (5 years) vs MNBRX (16 years). MNBRX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.34). MNBRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. FBAFX (44.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBRX: FBAFX (250) vs MNBRX (2000). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. MNBRX (-0.51). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.18 vs. MNBRX (-0.87).
| FBAFX | MNBRX | FBAFX / MNBRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.27 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.27 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.939 | 0.622 | 1,758% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 269B | 436M | 61,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.59 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | -0.51 | -1,817% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.03 | 19.16 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.18 | -0.87 | -4,404% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement