Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$16.09
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.22B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FAYZX (3.22B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.77) vs RLBAX (1.25). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.84). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.68 vs. RLBAX (13.33). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 43.73 vs. RLBAX (32.37).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.486 | 2.290 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 1.25 | 302% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.68 | 13.33 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.17 | 34.62 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.73 | 32.37 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.46 | 80.23 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers