Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$15.54
Change-$0.27 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.25B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FAYZX (3.25B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.73) vs RLBAX (1.08). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.84). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.59 vs. RLBAX (9.08). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.94 vs. RLBAX (36.92).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.768 | 15.481 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 1.08 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.59 | 9.08 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.47 | 40.52 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.94 | 36.92 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.71 | 69.99 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers