Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAYZX vs RLBAX
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FAYZX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income I
Price$15.66
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.23B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.28
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
FAYZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAYZX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAYZX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FAYZX (3.23B). FAYZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FAYZX (3.78) vs RLBAX (1.07). FAYZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FAYZX (10 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FAYZX (0.84). FAYZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FAYZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FAYZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FAYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.99 vs. RLBAX (8.53). FAYZX return over 5 years is better than : 44.30 vs. RLBAX (30.69).
| FAYZX | RLBAX | FAYZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.31 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.670 | 9.993 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.78 | 1.07 | 355% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.99 | 8.53 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.79 | 34.81 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.30 | 30.69 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.16 | 65.92 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement