FAVO
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.14 (-15.56%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.93K
FCMGF
Price
$8.93
Change
-$0.08 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
291.91M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAVO vs FCMGF

Header iconFAVO vs FCMGF Comparison
Open Charts FAVO vs FCMGFBanner chart's image
Favo Capital
Price$0.76
Change-$0.14 (-15.56%)
Volume$2.2K
Capitalization31.93K
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment
Price$8.93
Change-$0.08 (-0.89%)
Volume$600
Capitalization291.91M
FAVO vs FCMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAVO vs. FCMGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAVO is a Hold and FCMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FAVO: $0.76 vs. FCMGF: $8.93)
Brand notoriety: FAVO and FCMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAVO: 183% vs. FCMGF: 48%
Market capitalization -- FAVO: $31.93K vs. FCMGF: $291.91M
FAVO [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $31.93K. FCMGF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $291.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAVO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FAVO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCMGF is a better buy in the long-term than FAVO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAVO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCMGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAVO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCMGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCMGF is a better buy in the short-term than FAVO.

Price Growth

FAVO (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -12.77% price change this week, while FCMGF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCMGF($292M) has a higher market cap than FAVO($31.9K). FAVO YTD gains are higher at: 205.358 vs. FCMGF (5.994). FAVO has less debt than FCMGF: FAVO (10.2K) vs FCMGF (183M). FCMGF has higher revenues than FAVO: FCMGF (50.5M) vs FAVO (0).
FAVOFCMGFFAVO / FCMGF
Capitalization31.9K292M0%
EBITDA-99.38KN/A-
Gain YTD205.3585.9943,426%
P/E RatioN/A11.58-
Revenue050.5M-
Total Cash95N/A-
Total Debt10.2K183M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAVO vs FCMGF: Fundamental Ratings
FAVO
FCMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7281
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAVO's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCMGF (98). This means that FAVO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FAVO's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FCMGF (81). This means that FAVO’s stock grew similarly to FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (100). This means that FCMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

FAVO's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FCMGF (49). This means that FAVO’s stock grew similarly to FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAVO (100). This means that FCMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAVO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAVOFCMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAVO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCII91.951.44
+1.59%
LCI Industries
SHIP6.560.05
+0.77%
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp
QSR65.35-0.20
-0.31%
Restaurant Brands International
NFGC1.41-0.09
-6.00%
New Found Gold Corp
MTVA0.63-0.05
-7.35%
MetaVia Inc

FAVO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FAVO and RBRI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FAVO and RBRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAVO
1D Price
Change %
FAVO100%
N/A
RBRI - FAVO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EHMEF - FAVO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCMGF - FAVO
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
ECNCF - FAVO
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCRM - FAVO
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FCMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCMGF and BRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCMGF and BRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCMGF
1D Price
Change %
FCMGF100%
-0.83%
BRLGF - FCMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
TBCRF - FCMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CMPRF - FCMGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELEEF - FCMGF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
DVLN - FCMGF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More