Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FATWX vs RCDTX
FATWX vs RCDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATWX vs. RCDTX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATWX is a Hold and RCDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.8B vs. FATWX (2.08B). RCDTX pays higher dividends than FATWX: RCDTX (2.06) vs FATWX (1.96). FATWX was incepted earlier than RCDTX: FATWX (22 years) vs RCDTX (19 years). RCDTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FATWX (0.84). FATWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RCDTX (10.00). FATWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCDTX: FATWX (0) vs RCDTX (250). RCDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. FATWX (7.33). RCDTX return over 5 years is better than : 20.53 vs. FATWX (11.78).
| FATWX | RCDTX | FATWX / RCDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.267 | 8.707 | 72% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 32.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.06 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 9.34 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.60 | 22.82 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.78 | 20.53 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.24 | 41.15 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement