FATBP
Price
$6.98
Change
+$0.24 (+3.56%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
YOSH
Price
$12.55
Change
+$0.60 (+5.02%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
21.15M
Ad is loading...

FATBP vs YOSH

Header iconFATBP vs YOSH Comparison
Open Charts FATBP vs YOSHBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$6.98
Change+$0.24 (+3.56%)
Volume$8.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Yoshiharu Global
Price$12.55
Change+$0.60 (+5.02%)
Volume$9.79K
Capitalization21.15M
FATBP vs YOSH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YOSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBP vs. YOSH commentary
Apr 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a Hold and YOSH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBP: $6.98 vs. YOSH: $12.55)
Brand notoriety: FATBP and YOSH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBP: 34% vs. YOSH: 8%
Market capitalization -- FATBP: $0 vs. YOSH: $21.15M
FATBP [@Restaurants] is valued at $0. YOSH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $21.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $222.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYOSH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YOSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBP and YOSH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YOSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YOSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBP and YOSH are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while YOSH (@Restaurants) price change was -17.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

YOSH is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.71% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YOSH YTD gains are higher at: 282.622 vs. FATBP (-23.102). FATBP has more cash in the bank: 23.4M vs. YOSH (1.71M). YOSH has less debt than FATBP: YOSH (15.8M) vs FATBP (1.48B).
FATBPYOSHFATBP / YOSH
CapitalizationN/A21.1M-
EBITDAN/A-1.92M-
Gain YTD-23.102282.622-8%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A11.7M-
Total Cash23.4M1.71M1,367%
Total Debt1.48B15.8M9,335%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBPYOSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YOSH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

FATBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBP and CNNE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBP and CNNE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBP
1D Price
Change %
FATBP100%
+3.56%
CNNE - FATBP
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
TXRH - FATBP
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
RICK - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
FATBB - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
ARCO - FATBP
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.42%
More

YOSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YOSH and CBRL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YOSH and CBRL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YOSH
1D Price
Change %
YOSH100%
+5.02%
CBRL - YOSH
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
CAVA - YOSH
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
PTLO - YOSH
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
FATBP - YOSH
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
CHSN - YOSH
8%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
More