Advertisement
FATBP vs VSTD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a Hold and VSTD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FATBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVSTD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FATBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VSTD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FATBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VSTD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FATBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VSTD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а -73.35% price change this week, while VSTD (@Restaurants) price change was -13.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +4.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.49%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (+4.58% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FATBP | VSTD | FATBP / VSTD | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 4.19M | - |
| EBITDA | -45.09M | -1.65M | 2,724% |
| Gain YTD | -74.142 | 27.749 | -267% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 574M | 13.9M | 4,129% |
| Total Cash | 2.05M | 1.33M | 155% |
| Total Debt | 1.48B | 12.4M | 11,935% |
| FATBP | VSTD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 59% | 16 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
FATBP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FATBP has been closely correlated with FAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FATBP jumps, then FAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FATBP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATBP | 100% | N/A | ||
| FAT - FATBP | 95% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| VSTD - FATBP | 67% Closely correlated | -7.92% | ||
| CNNE - FATBP | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| GTIM - FATBP | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
| RRGB - FATBP | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||
VSTD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VSTD has been closely correlated with FAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VSTD jumps, then FAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VSTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSTD | 100% | -7.92% | ||
| FAT - VSTD | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| CNNE - VSTD | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| RRGB - VSTD | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| GTIM - VSTD | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.24% | ||
| SG - VSTD | 28% Poorly correlated | +6.90% | ||
More | ||||