FATBP
Price
$2.88
Change
-$0.01 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jul 22, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
RICK
Price
$38.94
Change
+$1.13 (+2.99%)
Updated
Jul 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
331.33M
141 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBP vs RICK

Header iconFATBP vs RICK Comparison
Open Charts FATBP vs RICKBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.35%)
Volume$138
CapitalizationN/A
RCI Hospitality Holdings
Price$38.94
Change+$1.13 (+2.99%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization331.33M
FATBP vs RICK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBP vs. RICK commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a Hold and RICK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBP: $2.89 vs. RICK: $37.81)
Brand notoriety: FATBP and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBP: 76% vs. RICK: 121%
Market capitalization -- FATBP: $0 vs. RICK: $331.33M
FATBP [@Restaurants] is valued at $0. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $331.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $211.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FATBP is a better buy in the long-term than RICK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FATBP is a better buy in the short-term than RICK.

Price Growth

FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а -8.50% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was -5.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

RICK is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+3.03% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RICK YTD gains are higher at: -33.991 vs. FATBP (-68.144). RICK has less debt than FATBP: RICK (271M) vs FATBP (1.48B).
FATBPRICKFATBP / RICK
CapitalizationN/A331M-
EBITDA-20.55MN/A-
Gain YTD-68.144-33.991200%
P/E RatioN/A43.97-
Revenue583MN/A-
Total Cash12.2MN/A-
Total Debt1.48B271M547%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RICK: Fundamental Ratings
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBPRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RICK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YGMZ0.830.05
+6.86%
MingZhu Logistics Holdings Limited
REI0.770.02
+2.65%
Ring Energy
EGP165.363.01
+1.85%
EastGroup Properties
VCEL35.460.12
+0.34%
Vericel Corp
NYMTL21.760.07
+0.34%
New York Mortgage Trust

FATBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBP and CNNE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBP and CNNE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBP
1D Price
Change %
FATBP100%
-4.25%
CNNE - FATBP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
SG - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
TXRH - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
FATBB - FATBP
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.99%
RICK - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More

RICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RICK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RICK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RICK
1D Price
Change %
RICK100%
+1.12%
CAKE - RICK
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
TXRH - RICK
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
KRUS - RICK
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
DIN - RICK
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
BJRI - RICK
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More