FATBP
Price
$2.57
Change
-$0.10 (-3.75%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PETZ
Price
$1.14
Change
+$0.04 (+3.64%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBP vs PETZ

Header iconFATBP vs PETZ Comparison
Open Charts FATBP vs PETZBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.57
Change-$0.10 (-3.75%)
Volume$27.69K
CapitalizationN/A
TDH Holdings
Price$1.14
Change+$0.04 (+3.64%)
Volume$16.94K
Capitalization11.77M
FATBP vs PETZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PETZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBP vs. PETZ commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a Buy and PETZ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBP: $2.57 vs. PETZ: $1.14)
Brand notoriety: FATBP and PETZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBP: 147% vs. PETZ: 11%
Market capitalization -- FATBP: $0 vs. PETZ: $11.77M
FATBP [@Restaurants] is valued at $0. PETZ’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $11.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePETZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PETZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBP and PETZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PETZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PETZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PETZ is a better buy in the short-term than FATBP.

Price Growth

FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.10% price change this week, while PETZ (@Restaurants) price change was +6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PETZ YTD gains are higher at: -8.800 vs. FATBP (-71.708). PETZ has less debt than FATBP: PETZ (1.04M) vs FATBP (1.49B).
FATBPPETZFATBP / PETZ
CapitalizationN/A11.8M-
EBITDA-34.51MN/A-
Gain YTD-71.708-8.800815%
P/E RatioN/A5.58-
Revenue578MN/A-
Total Cash7.65MN/A-
Total Debt1.49B1.04M143,642%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PETZ: Fundamental Ratings
PETZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBPPETZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PETZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VKTX26.631.66
+6.65%
Viking Therapeutics
XHLD0.32N/A
+1.06%
TEN Holdings Inc
MOLN3.680.01
+0.27%
Molecular Partners AG
CHD86.86-0.33
-0.38%
Church & Dwight Co
GILT11.73-0.29
-2.41%
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd

FATBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBP and CNNE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBP and CNNE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBP
1D Price
Change %
FATBP100%
-3.82%
CNNE - FATBP
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
TXRH - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
FATBB - FATBP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FAT - FATBP
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.74%
RICK - FATBP
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
More

PETZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PETZ has been loosely correlated with SGLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PETZ jumps, then SGLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PETZ
1D Price
Change %
PETZ100%
+3.59%
SGLOF - PETZ
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHSN - PETZ
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
RICK - PETZ
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.18%
FATBP - PETZ
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
YUM - PETZ
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
More