FATBP
Price
$2.84
Change
-$0.08 (-2.74%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
GTIM
Price
$1.72
Change
-$0.05 (-2.82%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
18.75M
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBP vs GTIM

Header iconFATBP vs GTIM Comparison
Open Charts FATBP vs GTIMBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.84
Change-$0.08 (-2.74%)
Volume$5.54K
CapitalizationN/A
Good Times Restaurants
Price$1.72
Change-$0.05 (-2.82%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization18.75M
FATBP vs GTIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBP vs. GTIM commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBP is a Hold and GTIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBP: $2.84 vs. GTIM: $1.72)
Brand notoriety: FATBP and GTIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBP: 13% vs. GTIM: 12%
Market capitalization -- FATBP: $0 vs. GTIM: $18.75M
FATBP [@Restaurants] is valued at $0. GTIM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $18.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBP and GTIM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTIM is a better buy in the short-term than FATBP.

Price Growth

FATBP (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.39% price change this week, while GTIM (@Restaurants) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

GTIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTIM YTD gains are higher at: -33.591 vs. FATBP (-68.712). GTIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.83M vs. FATBP (-20.55M). FATBP has more cash in the bank: 12.2M vs. GTIM (2.71M). GTIM has less debt than FATBP: GTIM (45.3M) vs FATBP (1.48B). FATBP has higher revenues than GTIM: FATBP (583M) vs GTIM (144M).
FATBPGTIMFATBP / GTIM
CapitalizationN/A18.7M-
EBITDA-20.55M4.83M-425%
Gain YTD-68.712-33.591205%
P/E RatioN/A19.11-
Revenue583M144M405%
Total Cash12.2M2.71M450%
Total Debt1.48B45.3M3,274%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTIM: Fundamental Ratings
GTIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBPGTIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROK329.953.74
+1.15%
Rockwell Automation
LENZ30.180.07
+0.23%
LENZ Therapeutics
PK10.52N/A
N/A
Park Hotels & Resorts
MOB2.84N/A
N/A
Mobilicom Limited
TUSK2.88-0.04
-1.37%
Mammoth Energy Services

FATBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBP and CNNE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBP and CNNE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBP
1D Price
Change %
FATBP100%
-2.74%
CNNE - FATBP
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
SG - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
TXRH - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
GTIM - FATBP
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
FATBB - FATBP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GTIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GTIM and JACK have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GTIM and JACK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTIM
1D Price
Change %
GTIM100%
-2.82%
JACK - GTIM
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
CNNE - GTIM
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
DIN - GTIM
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
SGLOF - GTIM
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOCO - GTIM
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More