FATBB
Price
$2.47
Change
-$0.22 (-8.18%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
42.59M
SIRZF
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
81.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBB vs SIRZF

Header iconFATBB vs SIRZF Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs SIRZFBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.47
Change-$0.22 (-8.18%)
Volume$3.46K
Capitalization42.59M
Sir Rty Income Fund
Price$9.90
Change-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization81.96M
FATBB vs SIRZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBB vs. SIRZF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a Hold and SIRZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBB: $2.47 vs. SIRZF: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: FATBB and SIRZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 111% vs. SIRZF: 25%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $42.59M vs. SIRZF: $81.96M
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $42.59M. SIRZF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $81.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIRZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIRZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIRZF is a better buy in the long-term than FATBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIRZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SIRZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FATBB is a better buy in the short-term than SIRZF.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а +12.27% price change this week, while SIRZF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIRZF($82M) has a higher market cap than FATBB($42.6M). SIRZF YTD gains are higher at: 9.960 vs. FATBB (-11.220). FATBB has higher revenues than SIRZF: FATBB (583M) vs SIRZF (14.9M).
FATBBSIRZFFATBB / SIRZF
Capitalization42.6M82M52%
EBITDA-20.55MN/A-
Gain YTD-11.2209.960-113%
P/E RatioN/A10.86-
Revenue583M14.9M3,913%
Total Cash12.2MN/A-
Total Debt1.48BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SIRZF: Fundamental Ratings
SIRZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBBSIRZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIRZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLGPX17.010.14
+0.83%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp R
IUAAX42.840.16
+0.37%
VY® Invesco Equity and Income A
DBMG41.58N/A
N/A
DBM Global Inc.
ASVDX9.83-0.01
-0.10%
American Century Small Cap Value R6
DUKR0.20-0.03
-13.61%
Duke Robotics Corp.

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and SHAK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and SHAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
N/A
SHAK - FATBB
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
CAVA - FATBB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
FAT - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
PTLO - FATBB
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SIRZF - FATBB
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIRZF and KRIUF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIRZF and KRIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIRZF
1D Price
Change %
SIRZF100%
N/A
KRIUF - SIRZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRI - SIRZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
GAMN - SIRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTBRF - SIRZF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSTRF - SIRZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More