FATBB
Price
$2.54
Change
+$0.03 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.59M
SHAK
Price
$94.21
Change
-$1.07 (-1.12%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBB vs SHAK

Header iconFATBB vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs SHAKBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.54
Change+$0.03 (+1.20%)
Volume$651
Capitalization36.59M
Shake Shack
Price$94.21
Change-$1.07 (-1.12%)
Volume$1.03M
Capitalization3.79B
FATBB vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBB vs. SHAK commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a Buy and SHAK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBB: $2.51 vs. SHAK: $94.21)
Brand notoriety: FATBB: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 89% vs. SHAK: 71%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $36.59M vs. SHAK: $3.79B
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $36.59M. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $215.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FATBB and SHAK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FATBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHAK is a better buy in the short-term than FATBB.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.60% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($3.79B) has a higher market cap than FATBB($36.6M). FATBB YTD gains are higher at: -9.679 vs. SHAK (-27.450). SHAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. FATBB (-34.51M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 337M vs. FATBB (7.65M). SHAK has less debt than FATBB: SHAK (838M) vs FATBB (1.49B). SHAK has higher revenues than FATBB: SHAK (1.32B) vs FATBB (578M).
FATBBSHAKFATBB / SHAK
Capitalization36.6M3.79B1%
EBITDA-34.51M137M-25%
Gain YTD-9.679-27.45035%
P/E RatioN/A200.45-
Revenue578M1.32B44%
Total Cash7.65M337M2%
Total Debt1.49B838M178%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBBSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UG7.740.16
+2.11%
United-Guardian
SPH18.670.03
+0.16%
Suburban Propane Partners L P
CB278.300.04
+0.01%
Chubb Limited
RDNT75.12-0.42
-0.56%
RadNet
LNKB7.30-0.08
-1.08%
LINKBANCORP

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and CAVA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and CAVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
-1.07%
CAVA - FATBB
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
SHAK - FATBB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
FAT - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
SBUX - FATBB
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
SIRZF - FATBB
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-1.16%
CAKE - SHAK
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
EAT - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
CAVA - SHAK
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
TXRH - SHAK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
KRUS - SHAK
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
More