FATBB
Price
$2.52
Change
+$0.19 (+8.15%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
41.36M
RTBRF
Price
$1.71
Change
+$0.09 (+5.56%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
228.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBB vs RTBRF

Header iconFATBB vs RTBRF Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs RTBRFBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.52
Change+$0.19 (+8.15%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization41.36M
Restaurant Brands NZ
Price$1.71
Change+$0.09 (+5.56%)
Volume$400
Capitalization228.48M
FATBB vs RTBRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBB vs. RTBRF commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a StrongBuy and RTBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBB: $2.58 vs. RTBRF: $1.71)
Brand notoriety: FATBB and RTBRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 16% vs. RTBRF: 91%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $41.36M vs. RTBRF: $228.48M
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $41.36M. RTBRF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $228.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTBRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTBRF is a better buy in the long-term than FATBB.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while RTBRF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTBRF($228M) has a higher market cap than FATBB($41.4M). RTBRF YTD gains are higher at: 8.917 vs. FATBB (-7.281).
FATBBRTBRFFATBB / RTBRF
Capitalization41.4M228M18%
EBITDA-12.82MN/A-
Gain YTD-7.2818.917-82%
P/E RatioN/A13.40-
Revenue593MN/A-
Total Cash23.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.48BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTBRF: Fundamental Ratings
RTBRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
62
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and SHAK have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and SHAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
+0.77%
SHAK - FATBB
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
CAVA - FATBB
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
FAT - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
PTLO - FATBB
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
SIRZF - FATBB
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTBRF and NROM have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTBRF and NROM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTBRF
1D Price
Change %
RTBRF100%
N/A
NROM - RTBRF
15%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
FBGI - RTBRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - RTBRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
FWRG - RTBRF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
SIRZF - RTBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More