FATBB
Price
$2.54
Change
+$0.03 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
35.79M
FBGI
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
340.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FATBB vs FBGI

Header iconFATBB vs FBGI Comparison
Open Charts FATBB vs FBGIBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.54
Change+$0.03 (+1.20%)
Volume$5.68K
Capitalization35.79M
Foodbase Group
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$77.64K
Capitalization340.81M
FATBB vs FBGI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FATBB vs. FBGI commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATBB is a Buy and FBGI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FATBB: $2.54 vs. FBGI: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: FATBB and FBGI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FATBB: 202% vs. FBGI: 100%
Market capitalization -- FATBB: $35.79M vs. FBGI: $340.81M
FATBB [@Restaurants] is valued at $35.79M. FBGI’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $340.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FATBB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBGI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBGI is a better buy in the long-term than FATBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FATBB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FATBB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FATBB (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.40% price change this week, while FBGI (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGI($341M) has a higher market cap than FATBB($35.8M). FBGI YTD gains are higher at: 9.091 vs. FATBB (-8.722).
FATBBFBGIFATBB / FBGI
Capitalization35.8M341M10%
EBITDA-34.51MN/A-
Gain YTD-8.7229.091-96%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue578MN/A-
Total Cash7.65MN/A-
Total Debt1.49BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBGI: Fundamental Ratings
FBGI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATBBFBGI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FATBB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBVSX15.290.16
+1.06%
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value
MNDKX33.580.34
+1.02%
MFS New Discovery R6
TANDX37.400.25
+0.67%
Castle Tandem No-Load
SBSDX52.220.31
+0.60%
Franklin S&P 500 Index D
NWZMX22.430.12
+0.54%
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and CAVA have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and CAVA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
+1.06%
CAVA - FATBB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHAK - FATBB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
FAT - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
SBUX - FATBB
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
SIRZF - FATBB
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FBGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FBGI and RTBRF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBGI and RTBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBGI
1D Price
Change %
FBGI100%
N/A
RTBRF - FBGI
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FATBB - FBGI
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
RSTRF - FBGI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSPPF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGLOF - FBGI
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More