FAT
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.14 (-5.20%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
45.7M
75 days until earnings call
WEN
Price
$12.26
Change
+$0.30 (+2.51%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
2.35B
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FAT vs WEN

Header iconFAT vs WEN Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs WENBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.55
Change-$0.14 (-5.20%)
Volume$41.98K
Capitalization45.7M
Wendy's
Price$12.26
Change+$0.30 (+2.51%)
Volume$4.25M
Capitalization2.35B
FAT vs WEN Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. WEN commentary
May 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Hold and WEN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.69 vs. WEN: $11.96)
Brand notoriety: FAT and WEN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 45% vs. WEN: 72%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $45.7M vs. WEN: $2.35B
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $45.7M. WEN’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $227.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWEN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WEN is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WEN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WEN is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -6.60% price change this week, while WEN (@Restaurants) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

WEN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.39% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WEN($2.35B) has a higher market cap than FAT($45.7M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -9.245 vs. WEN (-23.552). WEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 554M vs. FAT (-12.82M). WEN has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. FAT (23.4M). FAT has less debt than WEN: FAT (1.48B) vs WEN (4.09B). WEN has higher revenues than FAT: WEN (2.25B) vs FAT (593M).
FATWENFAT / WEN
Capitalization45.7M2.35B2%
EBITDA-12.82M554M-2%
Gain YTD-9.245-23.55239%
P/E RatioN/A13.04-
Revenue593M2.25B26%
Total Cash23.4M451M5%
Total Debt1.48B4.09B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT vs WEN: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
WEN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
10016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6384
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (9). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WEN (100). This means that FAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WEN’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's SMR Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that WEN’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WEN (84). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to WEN’s over the last 12 months.

WEN's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (100). This means that WEN’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATWEN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA349.987.16
+2.09%
Tesla
SPY594.203.74
+0.63%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL211.26-0.19
-0.09%
Apple
BTC.X103489.290000-255.351560
-0.25%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.45-0.18
-0.63%
GameStop Corp

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with FATBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then FATBB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
+3.07%
FATBB - FAT
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
WEN - FAT
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
TNGPF - FAT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RICK - FAT
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
QSR - FAT
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
More

WEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WEN has been loosely correlated with DIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WEN jumps, then DIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WEN
1D Price
Change %
WEN100%
+2.51%
DIN - WEN
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
BLMN - WEN
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
JACK - WEN
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
PZZA - WEN
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
QSR - WEN
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More