FAT
Price
$2.46
Change
+$0.09 (+3.80%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
41.36M
53 days until earnings call
TXRH
Price
$195.19
Change
+$3.51 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
12.72B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs TXRH

Header iconFAT vs TXRH Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs TXRHBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.46
Change+$0.09 (+3.80%)
Volume$48.2K
Capitalization41.36M
Texas Roadhouse
Price$195.19
Change+$3.51 (+1.83%)
Volume$541.69K
Capitalization12.72B
FAT vs TXRH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. TXRH commentary
Jun 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and TXRH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.30 vs. TXRH: $196.32)
Brand notoriety: FAT and TXRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 73% vs. TXRH: 80%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $41.36M vs. TXRH: $12.72B
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $41.36M. TXRH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $12.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTXRH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TXRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TXRH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TXRH is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was +4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

TXRH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TXRH($12.7B) has a higher market cap than FAT($41.4M). TXRH YTD gains are higher at: 9.239 vs. FAT (-22.403). TXRH has less debt than FAT: TXRH (908M) vs FAT (1.48B).
FATTXRHFAT / TXRH
Capitalization41.4M12.7B0%
EBITDA-12.82MN/A-
Gain YTD-22.4039.239-242%
P/E RatioN/A29.58-
Revenue593MN/A-
Total Cash23.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.48B908M162%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT vs TXRH: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
TXRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5627
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
657
SMR RATING
1..100
10028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10068
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for TXRH (74). This means that FAT’s stock grew significantly faster than TXRH’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAT (65). This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's SMR Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that TXRH’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAT (84). This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TXRH's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (100). This means that TXRH’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATTXRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TXRH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with GENK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then GENK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-3.77%
GENK - FAT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
BROS - FAT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
TXRH - FAT
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
QSR - FAT
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
CAVA - FAT
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

TXRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been closely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TXRH
1D Price
Change %
TXRH100%
-1.74%
CAKE - TXRH
68%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
DRI - TXRH
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
EAT - TXRH
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
BJRI - TXRH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
SHAK - TXRH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More