FAT
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.20 (-3.51%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
124 days until earnings call
TNGPF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Ad is loading...

FAT vs TNGPF

Header iconFAT vs TNGPF Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs TNGPFBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$5.50
Change-$0.20 (-3.51%)
Volume$30.28K
CapitalizationN/A
TANG PLACE CHINA HOLDINGS
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.98K
CapitalizationN/A
FAT vs TNGPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. TNGPF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a StrongBuy and TNGPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FAT: $5.50 vs. TNGPF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FAT and TNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 159% vs. TNGPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $93.1M vs. TNGPF: $33.2M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $93.1M. TNGPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $33.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $213.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than TNGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while TNGPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.06% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($93.1M) has a higher market cap than TNGPF($33.2M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -2.935 vs. TNGPF (-31.667).
FATTNGPFFAT / TNGPF
Capitalization93.1M33.2M280%
EBITDA26.1MN/A-
Gain YTD-2.935-31.6679%
P/E RatioN/A7.66-
Revenue606MN/A-
Total Cash16.8MN/A-
Total Debt1.45BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with FATBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then FATBB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-3.51%
FATBB - FAT
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
TNGPF - FAT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEN - FAT
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
PZZA - FAT
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
PBPB - FAT
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.28%
More

TNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNGPF and FAT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNGPF and FAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNGPF
1D Price
Change %
TNGPF100%
N/A
FAT - TNGPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
FWRG - TNGPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
PTLO - TNGPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.38%
GAMN - TNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HELFY - TNGPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.95%
More