FAT
Price
$2.03
Change
-$0.27 (-11.74%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
36.96M
35 days until earnings call
SBUX
Price
$84.27
Change
-$1.42 (-1.66%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
95.79B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs SBUX

Header iconFAT vs SBUX Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs SBUXBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.03
Change-$0.27 (-11.74%)
Volume$148.65K
Capitalization36.96M
Starbucks
Price$84.27
Change-$1.42 (-1.66%)
Volume$9.66M
Capitalization95.79B
FAT vs SBUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. SBUX commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and SBUX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.03 vs. SBUX: $84.27)
Brand notoriety: FAT: Not notable vs. SBUX: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 223% vs. SBUX: 95%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $36.96M vs. SBUX: $95.79B
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $36.96M. SBUX’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $95.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBUX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBUX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBUX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBUX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBUX is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.28% price change this week, while SBUX (@Restaurants) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

SBUX is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBUX($95.8B) has a higher market cap than FAT($37M). SBUX YTD gains are higher at: -5.877 vs. FAT (-31.512). SBUX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.79B vs. FAT (-34.51M). SBUX has more cash in the bank: 4.51B vs. FAT (7.65M). FAT has less debt than SBUX: FAT (1.49B) vs SBUX (27.9B). SBUX has higher revenues than FAT: SBUX (36.7B) vs FAT (578M).
FATSBUXFAT / SBUX
Capitalization37M95.8B0%
EBITDA-34.51M5.79B-1%
Gain YTD-31.512-5.877536%
P/E RatioN/A36.48-
Revenue578M36.7B2%
Total Cash7.65M4.51B0%
Total Debt1.49B27.9B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT vs SBUX: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
SBUX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2310
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8283
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (26). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (83). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that SBUX’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

FAT's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SBUX (62). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to SBUX’s over the last 12 months.

SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that SBUX’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATSBUX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBUX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMC22.690.74
+3.37%
Summit Midstream Corporation
LGL6.700.01
+0.15%
LGL Group (The)
TRML47.750.02
+0.04%
Tourmaline Bio
WELL170.97-1.58
-0.92%
Welltower
SITE130.59-3.42
-2.55%
SiteOne Landscape Supply

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-11.74%
SBUX - FAT
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
GENK - FAT
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
DIN - FAT
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
TXRH - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
CNNE - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

SBUX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBUX
1D Price
Change %
SBUX100%
-1.66%
SHAK - SBUX
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
KRUS - SBUX
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
EAT - SBUX
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
CMG - SBUX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
CAKE - SBUX
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More