FAT vs QSR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Hold and QSR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QSR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- QSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-1.14% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FAT | QSR | FAT / QSR | |
| Capitalization | 44.5M | 20.5B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -12.82M | 2.66B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | -15.318 | -2.114 | 725% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 19.88 | - |
| Revenue | 593M | 8.41B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 23.4M | 1.33B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 1.48B | 16B | 9% |
FAT | QSR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FAT's Valuation (2) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (20). This means that FAT’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (48). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's SMR Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that QSR’s stock grew significantly faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FAT (81). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to FAT’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FAT (100). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FAT’s over the last 12 months.
| FAT | QSR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 55% |
FAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with FATBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then FATBB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT | 100% | +3.29% | ||
| FATBB - FAT | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
| WEN - FAT | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.12% | ||
| TNGPF - FAT | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RICK - FAT | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
| QSR - FAT | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||
QSR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QSR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QSR | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| YUM - QSR | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| MCD - QSR | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| TXRH - QSR | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| DPZ - QSR | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| JACK - QSR | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||