FAT
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.05 (+2.73%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
34.54M
54 days until earnings call
HDL
Price
$19.00
Change
+$0.20 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs HDL

Header iconFAT vs HDL Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs HDLBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$1.88
Change+$0.05 (+2.73%)
Volume$22.97K
Capitalization34.54M
Super Hi International Holding Ltd ADR
Price$19.00
Change+$0.20 (+1.06%)
Volume$798
Capitalization1.12B
FAT vs HDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. HDL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and HDL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $1.88 vs. HDL: $19.00)
Brand notoriety: FAT and HDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 38% vs. HDL: 20%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $34.54M vs. HDL: $1.12B
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $34.54M. HDL’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $224.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHDL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HDL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than HDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HDL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HDL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the short-term than HDL.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.87% price change this week, while HDL (@Restaurants) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HDL is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.38% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HDL($1.12B) has a higher market cap than FAT($34.5M). HDL YTD gains are higher at: -33.919 vs. FAT (-36.573). HDL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. FAT (-34.51M). HDL has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. FAT (7.65M). HDL has less debt than FAT: HDL (209M) vs FAT (1.49B). HDL has higher revenues than FAT: HDL (788M) vs FAT (578M).
FATHDLFAT / HDL
Capitalization34.5M1.12B3%
EBITDA-34.51M140M-25%
Gain YTD-36.573-33.919108%
P/E RatioN/A19.00-
Revenue578M788M73%
Total Cash7.65M253M3%
Total Debt1.49B209M713%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATHDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THGIX26.690.17
+0.64%
Thornburg International Growth R6
PJFPX75.99N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Growth R4
CESGX11.93N/A
N/A
Coho Relative Value ESG
HDIVX18.20N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson International Div I
LADVX32.40N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R6

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
+2.73%
SBUX - FAT
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
GENK - FAT
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
RICK - FAT
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
DIN - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
TXRH - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More

HDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HDL and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDL and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDL
1D Price
Change %
HDL100%
+1.09%
YUMC - HDL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
YUM - HDL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
FAT - HDL
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
RICK - HDL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
GENK - HDL
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More