Advertisement
FAT vs HDL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Hold and HDL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHDL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HDL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HDL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -37.46% price change this week, while HDL (@Restaurants) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
FAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2026.
HDL is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (+1.67% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FAT | HDL | FAT / HDL | |
| Capitalization | 3.84M | 966M | 0% |
| EBITDA | -45.09M | 159M | -28% |
| Gain YTD | -48.315 | 0.313 | -15,426% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 16.11 | - |
| Revenue | 574M | 804M | 71% |
| Total Cash | 2.05M | 267M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 1.48B | 221M | 670% |
FAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FAT | HDL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
FAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with FATBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then FATBB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAT | 100% | -22.57% | ||
| FATBB - FAT | 41% Loosely correlated | +15.87% | ||
| FATBP - FAT | 32% Poorly correlated | -13.72% | ||
| DIN - FAT | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| CNNE - FAT | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.52% | ||
| SBUX - FAT | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||
HDL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HDL and FATBP have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HDL and FATBP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HDL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDL | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| FATBP - HDL | 27% Poorly correlated | -13.72% | ||
| YUMC - HDL | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| FAT - HDL | 21% Poorly correlated | -22.57% | ||
| YUM - HDL | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.65% | ||
| GTIM - HDL | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
More | ||||