FAT
Price
$2.36
Change
-$0.02 (-0.84%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
42.59M
33 days until earnings call
GENK
Price
$3.69
Change
+$0.08 (+2.22%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
18.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs GENK

Header iconFAT vs GENK Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs GENKBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.36
Change-$0.02 (-0.84%)
Volume$25.4K
Capitalization42.59M
GEN Restaurant Group
Price$3.69
Change+$0.08 (+2.22%)
Volume$27.27K
Capitalization18.54M
FAT vs GENK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. GENK commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and GENK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.36 vs. GENK: $3.69)
Brand notoriety: FAT and GENK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 50% vs. GENK: 33%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $42.59M vs. GENK: $18.54M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $42.59M. GENK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $18.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGENK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GENK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GENK is a better buy in the long-term than FAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GENK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GENK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GENK is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.72% price change this week, while GENK (@Restaurants) price change was -2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($42.6M) has a higher market cap than GENK($18.5M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -20.378 vs. GENK (-50.317). GENK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.8M vs. FAT (-20.55M). GENK has more cash in the bank: 15.4M vs. FAT (12.2M). GENK has less debt than FAT: GENK (160M) vs FAT (1.48B). FAT has higher revenues than GENK: FAT (583M) vs GENK (215M).
FATGENKFAT / GENK
Capitalization42.6M18.5M230%
EBITDA-20.55M13.8M-149%
Gain YTD-20.378-50.31740%
P/E RatioN/A31.15-
Revenue583M215M271%
Total Cash12.2M15.4M79%
Total Debt1.48B160M927%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
79
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATGENK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIQT1.710.13
+8.23%
LiqTech International
MATX111.983.31
+3.05%
Matsons
DAL49.590.62
+1.27%
Delta Air Lines
SLRC16.090.01
+0.06%
SLR Investment Corp
DSX1.51-0.07
-4.43%
Diana Shipping

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with GENK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then GENK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-0.84%
GENK - FAT
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
BROS - FAT
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
DENN - FAT
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
TXRH - FAT
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
RICK - FAT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

GENK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GENK has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GENK jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GENK
1D Price
Change %
GENK100%
+2.22%
SHAK - GENK
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
FAT - GENK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
JACK - GENK
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
CAKE - GENK
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
TXRH - GENK
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
More