FAT
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.14 (-5.20%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
45.7M
75 days until earnings call
GENK
Price
$4.05
Change
+$0.03 (+0.75%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
20.41M
Ad is loading...

FAT vs GENK

Header iconFAT vs GENK Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs GENKBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.55
Change-$0.14 (-5.20%)
Volume$41.98K
Capitalization45.7M
GEN Restaurant Group
Price$4.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.75%)
Volume$89.19K
Capitalization20.41M
FAT vs GENK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. GENK commentary
May 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Hold and GENK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.55 vs. GENK: $4.05)
Brand notoriety: FAT and GENK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 125% vs. GENK: 143%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $45.7M vs. GENK: $20.41M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $45.7M. GENK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $20.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $227.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGENK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GENK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than GENK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GENK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GENK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the short-term than GENK.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -7.27% price change this week, while GENK (@Restaurants) price change was -13.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

GENK is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.66% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($45.7M) has a higher market cap than GENK($20.4M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -13.968 vs. GENK (-45.856). GENK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19M vs. FAT (-12.82M). GENK (23.7M) and FAT (23.4M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GENK has less debt than FAT: GENK (153M) vs FAT (1.48B). FAT has higher revenues than GENK: FAT (593M) vs GENK (208M).
FATGENKFAT / GENK
Capitalization45.7M20.4M224%
EBITDA-12.82M19M-67%
Gain YTD-13.968-45.85630%
P/E RatioN/A31.15-
Revenue593M208M285%
Total Cash23.4M23.7M99%
Total Debt1.48B153M964%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATGENK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA349.987.16
+2.09%
Tesla
SPY594.203.74
+0.63%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL211.26-0.19
-0.09%
Apple
BTC.X103489.290000-255.351560
-0.25%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.45-0.18
-0.63%
GameStop Corp

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with FATBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then FATBB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-5.20%
FATBB - FAT
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.47%
GENK - FAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
TXRH - FAT
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
DENN - FAT
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.08%
TNGPF - FAT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GENK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GENK has been loosely correlated with SHAK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GENK jumps, then SHAK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GENK
1D Price
Change %
GENK100%
+0.75%
SHAK - GENK
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
CAKE - GENK
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
BROS - GENK
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.92%
SG - GENK
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
EAT - GENK
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
More