FAT
Price
$2.03
Change
-$0.27 (-11.74%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
36.96M
35 days until earnings call
GENK
Price
$2.93
Change
-$0.09 (-2.98%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs GENK

Header iconFAT vs GENK Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs GENKBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.03
Change-$0.27 (-11.74%)
Volume$148.65K
Capitalization36.96M
GEN Restaurant Group
Price$2.93
Change-$0.09 (-2.98%)
Volume$202.12K
Capitalization15.38M
FAT vs GENK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. GENK commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and GENK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.03 vs. GENK: $2.93)
Brand notoriety: FAT and GENK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 223% vs. GENK: 268%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $36.96M vs. GENK: $15.38M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $36.96M. GENK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $15.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGENK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GENK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FAT and GENK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GENK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GENK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GENK is a better buy in the short-term than FAT.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а +6.28% price change this week, while GENK (@Restaurants) price change was -6.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.11% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($37M) has a higher market cap than GENK($15.4M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -31.512 vs. GENK (-60.550). GENK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.76M vs. FAT (-34.51M). GENK has more cash in the bank: 9.61M vs. FAT (7.65M). GENK has less debt than FAT: GENK (174M) vs FAT (1.49B). FAT has higher revenues than GENK: FAT (578M) vs GENK (216M).
FATGENKFAT / GENK
Capitalization37M15.4M240%
EBITDA-34.51M9.76M-354%
Gain YTD-31.512-60.55052%
P/E RatioN/A31.15-
Revenue578M216M268%
Total Cash7.65M9.61M80%
Total Debt1.49B174M857%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FATGENK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GENK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMC22.690.74
+3.37%
Summit Midstream Corporation
LGL6.700.01
+0.15%
LGL Group (The)
TRML47.750.02
+0.04%
Tourmaline Bio
WELL170.97-1.58
-0.92%
Welltower
SITE130.59-3.42
-2.55%
SiteOne Landscape Supply

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with SBUX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then SBUX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-11.74%
SBUX - FAT
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
GENK - FAT
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
DIN - FAT
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
TXRH - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
CNNE - FAT
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

GENK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GENK has been loosely correlated with FAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GENK jumps, then FAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GENK
1D Price
Change %
GENK100%
-2.82%
FAT - GENK
35%
Loosely correlated
-11.74%
SHAK - GENK
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
CAKE - GENK
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
CNNE - GENK
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
SBUX - GENK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
More