FAT
Price
$2.46
Change
+$0.09 (+3.80%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
41.36M
53 days until earnings call
FATBB
Price
$2.52
Change
+$0.19 (+8.15%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
41.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAT vs FATBB

Header iconFAT vs FATBB Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs FATBBBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$2.46
Change+$0.09 (+3.80%)
Volume$48.2K
Capitalization41.36M
FAT Brands
Price$2.52
Change+$0.19 (+8.15%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization41.36M
FAT vs FATBB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. FATBB commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a Buy and FATBB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FAT: $2.30 vs. FATBB: $2.58)
Brand notoriety: FAT and FATBB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 73% vs. FATBB: 16%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $41.36M vs. FATBB: $41.36M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $41.36M. FATBB’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $41.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $220.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFATBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than FATBB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while FATBB (@Restaurants) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.86% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($41.4M) and FATBB($41.4M) have the same market capitalization . FATBB YTD gains are higher at: -7.281 vs. FAT (-22.403). FAT (-12.82M) and FATBB (-12.82M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FAT (23.4M) and FATBB (23.4M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FAT (1.48B) and FATBB (1.48B) have identical debt. FAT (593M) and FATBB (593M) have equivalent revenues.
FATFATBBFAT / FATBB
Capitalization41.4M41.4M100%
EBITDA-12.82M-12.82M100%
Gain YTD-22.403-7.281308%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue593M593M100%
Total Cash23.4M23.4M100%
Total Debt1.48B1.48B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAT has been loosely correlated with GENK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FAT jumps, then GENK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAT
1D Price
Change %
FAT100%
-3.77%
GENK - FAT
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
BROS - FAT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
TXRH - FAT
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
QSR - FAT
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
CAVA - FAT
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
More

FATBB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and SHAK have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and SHAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FATBB
1D Price
Change %
FATBB100%
+0.77%
SHAK - FATBB
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
CAVA - FATBB
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
FAT - FATBB
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
PTLO - FATBB
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
SIRZF - FATBB
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More