FAST
Price
$42.19
Change
-$0.56 (-1.31%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.08B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
IDDWF
Price
$26.45
Change
-$2.03 (-7.13%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
9.05B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAST vs IDDWF

Header iconFAST vs IDDWF Comparison
Open Charts FAST vs IDDWFBanner chart's image
Fastenal
Price$42.19
Change-$0.56 (-1.31%)
Volume$6.91K
Capitalization49.08B
Indutrade AB
Price$26.45
Change-$2.03 (-7.13%)
Volume$450
Capitalization9.05B
FAST vs IDDWF Comparison Chart in %
FAST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAST vs. IDDWF commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAST is a Hold and IDDWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FAST: $42.75 vs. IDDWF: $26.45)
Brand notoriety: FAST: Notable vs. IDDWF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAST: 234% vs. IDDWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FAST: $49.08B vs. IDDWF: $9.05B
FAST [@Electronics Distributors] is valued at $49.08B. IDDWF’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $9.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $49.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $7.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIDDWF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FAST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IDDWF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAST is a better buy in the long-term than IDDWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FAST (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -9.91% price change this week, while IDDWF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAST is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics Distributors (-2.11% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAST($49.1B) has a higher market cap than IDDWF($9.05B). FAST has higher P/E ratio than IDDWF: FAST (40.14) vs IDDWF (34.35). FAST YTD gains are higher at: 22.821 vs. IDDWF (-10.278). IDDWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.03B vs. FAST (1.75B). IDDWF has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. FAST (238M). FAST has less debt than IDDWF: FAST (545M) vs IDDWF (10.1B). IDDWF has higher revenues than FAST: IDDWF (32.5B) vs FAST (7.77B).
FASTIDDWFFAST / IDDWF
Capitalization49.1B9.05B542%
EBITDA1.75B4.03B43%
Gain YTD22.821-10.278-222%
P/E Ratio40.1434.35117%
Revenue7.77B32.5B24%
Total Cash238M1.57B15%
Total Debt545M10.1B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAST: Fundamental Ratings
FAST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FASTIDDWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUYW14.230.01
+0.07%
Main BuyWrite ETF
MSFY27.28-0.01
-0.04%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Microsoft ETF
TIP111.67-0.12
-0.11%
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
DRLL27.87-0.06
-0.20%
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
BKEM72.17-0.64
-0.87%
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF

FAST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAST has been closely correlated with GWW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAST jumps, then GWW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAST
1D Price
Change %
FAST100%
+0.99%
GWW - FAST
70%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
TRNS - FAST
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
IDDWF - FAST
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUSMF - FAST
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
MSM - FAST
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

IDDWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IDDWF and FAST have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IDDWF and FAST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IDDWF
1D Price
Change %
IDDWF100%
N/A
FAST - IDDWF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
KHDHF - IDDWF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WJXFF - IDDWF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
HDIUF - IDDWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EENEF - IDDWF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More