Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASRX vs GCRTX
FASRX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASRX vs. GCRTX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASRX is a Hold and GCRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. FASRX (524M). FASRX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FASRX (2.74) vs GCRTX (0.00). FASRX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FASRX (12 years) vs GCRTX (18 years). FASRX (2.40) is less costly to investors than GCRTX (1.94). FASRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. GCRTX (179.00). GCRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASRX: GCRTX (1000) vs FASRX (1000000). GCRTX (5.05) and FASRX (5.00) have marching annual gain over last year. GCRTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.27 vs. FASRX (3.02).
| FASRX | GCRTX | FASRX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.18 | 1.85 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 1.94 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.799 | 1.441 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 5.73B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.00 | 5.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.68 | 20.94 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.02 | 7.27 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.10 | 22.23 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers