Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASPX vs MVCAX
FASPX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs MVCAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$50.11
Change+$0.50 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
FASPX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. FASPX (1.69B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FASPX: MVCAX (1.24) vs FASPX (0.61). FASPX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASPX (39 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FASPX (1.34) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MVCAX (24.00). MVCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FASPX (4%) vs FASPX (4%). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: FASPX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). FASPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. MVCAX (2.32). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 29.79 vs. MVCAX (23.83).
| FASPX | MVCAX | FASPX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.99 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.00 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.381 | 4.922 | 150% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 17.1B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.24 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 2.32 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.72 | 13.55 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.79 | 23.83 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.41 | 101.81 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement