Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASPX vs JVMCX
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FASPX vs JVMCX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies M
Price$47.09
Change+$0.25 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
FASPX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASPX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASPX is a Buy and JVMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. FASPX (1.7B). FASPX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FASPX (0.41) vs JVMCX (0.00). FASPX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FASPX (39 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FASPX (1.34). FASPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). FASPX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FASPX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. FASPX (-3.95). FASPX return over 5 years is better than : 75.67 vs. JVMCX (55.49).
| FASPX | JVMCX | FASPX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.88 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.598 | 7.905 | 8% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 22.6B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 1.79 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.57 | 20.12 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.67 | 55.49 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.57 | 35.64 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement