Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBEX
FASMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBEX
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%
Price$22.81
Change-$0.22 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.08B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$38.99
Change-$0.49 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FASMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FASMX (10.1B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FASMX (2.20) vs RLBEX (1.71). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FASMX (37 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). RLBEX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.55). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FASMX (12.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FASMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). FASMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.46 vs. RLBEX (8.72). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.52 vs. FASMX (26.35).
| FASMX | RLBEX | FASMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.59 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.59 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.453 | 14.778 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.71 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.46 | 8.72 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.39 | 42.57 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.35 | 39.52 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.44 | 76.34 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement