Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBAX
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%
Price$23.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.09B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.28
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.37B
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FASMX (10.1B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FASMX (2.20) vs RLBAX (1.07). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FASMX (37 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FASMX (12.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FASMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FASMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. RLBAX (8.53). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.69 vs. FASMX (22.65).
| FASMX | RLBAX | FASMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.31 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.31 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.397 | 9.993 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.07 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 8.53 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.27 | 34.81 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 30.69 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.25 | 65.92 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers