Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASMX vs RLBAX
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FASMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%
Price$22.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.34B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FASMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FASMX (10.3B). FASMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FASMX (2.36) vs RLBAX (1.25). FASMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FASMX (37 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FASMX (12.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FASMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. FASMX (11.99). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. FASMX (17.98).
| FASMX | RLBAX | FASMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.31 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.31 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.787 | 2.290 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 270B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.36 | 1.25 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 13.33 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.27 | 34.62 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.98 | 32.37 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.68 | 80.23 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers