Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASIX vs MXCPX
FASIX vs MXCPX Comparison
Open Charts FASIX vs MXCPX
Fidelity Asset Manager 20%
Price$13.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
Empower Conservative Profile I
Price$7.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
FASIX vs MXCPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASIX vs. MXCPX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASIX is a Buy and MXCPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FASIX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. MXCPX (1.44B). FASIX pays higher dividends than MXCPX: FASIX (3.21) vs MXCPX (3.01). FASIX was incepted earlier than MXCPX: FASIX (33 years) vs MXCPX (26 years). MXCPX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FASIX (0.49). MXCPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FASIX (24.00). FASIX (0) and MXCPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FASIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. MXCPX (3.58). FASIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.05 vs. MXCPX (9.57).
| FASIX | MXCPX | FASIX / MXCPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.77 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.85 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.825 | 4.178 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.51B | 1.44B | 383% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 3.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 3.58 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.51 | 8.42 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.05 | 9.57 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.10 | 16.02 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement