Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASEX vs MVCAX
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FASEX vs MVCAX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Opportunities A
Price$54.37
Change+$0.21 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.85M
FASEX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASEX vs. MVCAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASEX is a Hold and MVCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. FASEX (346M). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FASEX: MVCAX (1.24) vs FASEX (1.05). FASEX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FASEX (38 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FASEX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). MVCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FASEX (20.00). FASEX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MVCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FASEX: MVCAX (1000) vs FASEX (2500). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.50 vs. FASEX (-0.63). FASEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.94 vs. MVCAX (22.73).
| FASEX | MVCAX | FASEX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.00 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.578 | 3.991 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 17.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.24 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.63 | 2.50 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.42 | 12.55 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.94 | 22.73 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.62 | 100.02 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers