Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FASCX vs GCRTX
FASCX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FASCX vs. GCRTX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FASCX is a Hold and GCRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. FASCX (524M). FASCX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FASCX (1.45) vs GCRTX (0.00). FASCX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FASCX (12 years) vs GCRTX (18 years). FASCX (3.47) is less costly to investors than GCRTX (1.94). FASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 266.59 vs. GCRTX (179.00). FASCX (1000) and GCRTX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GCRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. FASCX (3.76). GCRTX return over 5 years is better than : 7.27 vs. FASCX (-2.85).
| FASCX | GCRTX | FASCX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.18 | 1.85 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.47 | 1.94 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.590 | 1.441 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 524M | 5.73B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.76 | 5.05 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.65 | 20.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.85 | 7.27 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.10 | 22.23 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers