Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAS vs QLD
FAS vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAS vs. QLD commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a StrongBuy and QLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 9B vs. FAS (2.65B). FAS (12.543) and QLD (12.283) have matching annual dividend yield . FAS was incepted earlier than QLD: FAS (17 years) vs QLD (19 years). FAS (0.89) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95). QLD has a higher turnover FAS (19.00) vs FAS (19.00).
| FAS | QLD | FAS / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 12.543 | 12.283 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 9B | 29% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 24.00 | 79% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 0.22 | 387% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAS | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| HBAN - FAS | 85% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| TFC - FAS | 83% Closely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| CFG - FAS | 82% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| CPAY - FAS | 82% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| SYF - FAS | 81% Closely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| META - QLD | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ARM - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| NXPI - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||