Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAS vs QLD
FAS vs QLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAS vs. QLD commentary
Jun 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Hold and QLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 8.02B vs. FAS (2.5B). FAS has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: FAS (1.803) vs QLD (-3.218). FAS was incepted earlier than QLD: FAS (17 years) vs QLD (19 years). FAS (0.89) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95). QLD has a higher turnover FAS (19.00) vs FAS (19.00).
| FAS | QLD | FAS / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 1.803 | -3.218 | -56% |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 8.02B | 31% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 24.00 | 79% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.23 | 339% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAS | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 90% | 22 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 13 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 13 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | 100% | -1.98% | ||
| HBAN - FAS | 84% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| TFC - FAS | 83% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| CFG - FAS | 83% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| CPAY - FAS | 81% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| SYF - FAS | 81% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | -10.67% | ||
| NXPI - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| MSFT - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||