Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAS vs QLD
FAS vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAS vs. QLD commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAS is a Buy and QLD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 8.58B vs. FAS (2.6B). FAS has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: FAS (9.631) vs QLD (7.528). FAS was incepted earlier than QLD: FAS (17 years) vs QLD (19 years). FAS (0.89) has a lower expense ratio than QLD (0.95). QLD has a higher turnover FAS (19.00) vs FAS (19.00).
| FAS | QLD | FAS / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.631 | 7.528 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 8.58B | 30% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.95 | 94% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 24.00 | 79% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.23 | 339% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FAS | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCTE | 26.36 | 0.18 | +0.69% |
| SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF | |||
| EMIF | 22.93 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF | |||
| TRFK | 58.33 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | |||
| TSLR | 19.65 | -0.29 | -1.45% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
| BAR | 32.26 | -0.59 | -1.80% |
| GraniteShares Gold Trust | |||
FAS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAS has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAS jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | 100% | +0.78% | ||
| HBAN - FAS | 85% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| TFC - FAS | 83% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CFG - FAS | 82% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| CPAY - FAS | 81% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| KKR - FAS | 81% Closely correlated | +1.78% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | +4.62% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NXPI - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||