Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOTX vs RBCTX
FAOTX vs RBCTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOTX vs. RBCTX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOTX is a Hold and RBCTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAOTX (14.8B) and RBCTX (14.8B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FAOTX pays higher dividends than RBCTX: FAOTX (2.38) vs RBCTX (1.73). FAOTX was incepted earlier than RBCTX: FAOTX (12 years) vs RBCTX (19 years). RBCTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FAOTX (0.66). FAOTX (5.00) and RBCTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FAOTX (250) and RBCTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FAOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.17 vs. RBCTX (8.34). FAOTX return over 5 years is better than : 17.56 vs. RBCTX (14.02).
| FAOTX | RBCTX | FAOTX / RBCTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.835 | 13.146 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 14.8B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 1.73 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.17 | 8.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.75 | 24.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 14.02 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.45 | 42.79 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers