Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$19.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$88.16
Change+$0.18 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FAOFX (1.02B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.58) vs FAOFX (0.37). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.10 vs. RGAGX (12.02). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 41.92 vs. FAOFX (4.16).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.940 | 18.256 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.10 | 12.02 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 124.35 | 73.65 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.16 | 41.92 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.54 | 103.73 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement