Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$19.97
Change-$0.05 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.83
Change+$0.54 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. FAOFX (1B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.57) vs FAOFX (0.36). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. RGAGX (7.42). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. FAOFX (-2.19).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.302 | 19.262 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.57 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.59 | 7.42 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.03 | 63.01 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.19 | 33.65 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.87 | 96.59 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement