Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$19.33
Change+$0.20 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.65M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FAOFX (984M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.59) vs FAOFX (0.38). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.79 vs. RGAGX (18.90). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. FAOFX (8.07).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.556 | 16.016 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.59 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.79 | 18.90 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.34 | 61.40 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.07 | 44.13 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.05 | 102.81 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement