Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGAGX
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$19.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets992.6M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FAOFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FAOFX (993M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FAOFX: RGAGX (0.60) vs FAOFX (0.38). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). RGAGX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FAOFX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.71 vs. RGAGX (15.11). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. FAOFX (11.46).
| FAOFX | RGAGX | FAOFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.30 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.435 | 14.500 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.60 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.71 | 15.11 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.75 | 43.78 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.46 | 46.14 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.19 | 90.14 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement