Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FAOFX vs RGACX
FAOFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FAOFX vs RGACX
Fidelity Advisor Series Growth Opps
Price$19.33
Change+$0.20 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets983.65M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FAOFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FAOFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAOFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FAOFX (984M). FAOFX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FAOFX (0.38) vs RGACX (0.07). FAOFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FAOFX (12 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FAOFX (0.01). FAOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FAOFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FAOFX (0) vs RGACX (250). FAOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.79 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. FAOFX (8.07).
| FAOFX | RGACX | FAOFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.94 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.556 | 15.516 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.07 | 534% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.79 | 17.83 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.34 | 58.53 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.07 | 40.02 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.05 | 95.93 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement