FANG
Price
$139.09
Change
-$0.35 (-0.25%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
40.26B
16 days until earnings call
VOC
Price
$2.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.34%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
50.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FANG vs VOC

Header iconFANG vs VOC Comparison
Open Charts FANG vs VOCBanner chart's image
Diamondback Energy
Price$139.09
Change-$0.35 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.54M
Capitalization40.26B
VOC Energy Trust
Price$2.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.34%)
Volume$28.08K
Capitalization50.32M
FANG vs VOC Comparison Chart in %
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FANG vs. VOC commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FANG is a Hold and VOC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FANG: $139.09 vs. VOC: $2.96)
Brand notoriety: FANG: Notable vs. VOC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FANG: 82% vs. VOC: 43%
Market capitalization -- FANG: $40.26B vs. VOC: $50.32M
FANG [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $40.26B. VOC’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $50.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $108.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVOC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FANG is a better buy in the long-term than VOC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FANG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VOC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VOC is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while VOC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FANG is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.44% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($40.3B) has a higher market cap than VOC($50.3M). FANG has higher P/E ratio than VOC: FANG (10.08) vs VOC (5.15). FANG YTD gains are higher at: -13.288 vs. VOC (-32.010). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.71B vs. VOC (9.78M). FANG has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. VOC (1.85M). VOC has less debt than FANG: VOC (24M) vs FANG (15.1B). FANG has higher revenues than VOC: FANG (14B) vs VOC (11M).
FANGVOCFANG / VOC
Capitalization40.3B50.3M80,119%
EBITDA9.71B9.78M99,355%
Gain YTD-13.288-32.01042%
P/E Ratio10.085.15196%
Revenue14B11M127,273%
Total Cash219M1.85M11,857%
Total Debt15.1B24M62,917%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG vs VOC: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
VOC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3575
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3995
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3966
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VOC's Valuation (3) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANG (67). This means that VOC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANG’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VOC (75). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than VOC’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's SMR Rating (100) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as VOC (100). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to VOC’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VOC (95). This means that FANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than VOC’s over the last 12 months.

FANG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as VOC (66). This means that FANG’s stock grew similarly to VOC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FANGVOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VOC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GARP65.990.15
+0.23%
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
MARM32.640.03
+0.11%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Mar
XHYD38.40N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr N-Cyclcls Sctr ETF
EDV70.04-0.18
-0.26%
Vanguard Extended Duration Trs ETF
KIO11.70-0.04
-0.34%
KKR Income OPPORTUNITIES FUND

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
-0.25%
MTDR - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
CHRD - FANG
89%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
PR - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
OVV - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-1.29%
DVN - FANG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
More

VOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOC has been loosely correlated with MUR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VOC jumps, then MUR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VOC
1D Price
Change %
VOC100%
-0.34%
MUR - VOC
43%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
VET - VOC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
COP - VOC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
FANG - VOC
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
APA - VOC
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
More